58 pages • 1 hour read
Karen ArmstrongA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Karen Armstrong references various religious scriptures throughout the book. How does she apply literary analysis to draw parallels between these scriptures, and what does this approach reveal about common themes and devices in sacred texts?
Armstrong touches upon anthropomorphic conceptions of God. Examine the potential implications of such portrayals on the believer’s psyche and societal values. Does envisioning God in human-like terms limit or enhance spiritual experiences?
Discuss the role of mysticism in the histories of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as presented in Armstrong’s work. How do mystical traditions challenge or complement orthodox understandings of God? How do they compare to more literal approaches?
Delve into the instances in A History of God where political ambitions and challenges influenced theological developments. How do these intersections challenge or solidify the notion of a singular God?
Drawing on the historical trajectory presented by Armstrong, discuss the relevance of the book’s themes in the modern context. How do contemporary debates about secularism, religious fundamentalism, and/or interfaith dialogue resonate with or challenge the ideas presented in A History of God?
Armstrong tends to regard secularism and religious skepticism as a predominately modern phenomenon, yet atheism existed even in the ancient world. Research the ideas of early atheist thinkers, such as Epicurus or Lucretius. What was the trajectory and influence of this alternative intellectual tradition? How does it compare to the later atheistic movements examined by Armstrong in A History of God?
Evaluate the balance Armstrong strives to maintain as both a historian and a former nun. How does her personal journey of faith (or the loss of it) permeate her academic exploration? Does her personal experience enrich the narrative, or does it introduce biases?
Given Armstrong’s chronological approach to the evolution of the concept of God, to what extent can one argue for or against a sense of continuity or rupture in this progression across various religious traditions?
Critics of Armstrong’s work have suggested that she sometimes ignores the nuances of the differences between religious traditions in her aim for a universalist and inclusive approach. What, if any, are some of the nuances Armstrong’s analysis may have missed? Is her universalist approach ultimately an effective one? Why or why not?